FX-Brokers.eu
Menu
Trusted by traders25 brokers tested2,470+ pages indexedIndependent since 2024Updated daily

Trading 212 vs RoboForex

Head-to-head comparison of fees, platforms, regulation, and trading conditions to help you choose the right EU broker in 2026.

T2
Trading 212
Est. 2004 · London, UK
8.9
VS
R
RoboForex
Est. 2009 · Belize City, Belize
8.4

Quick Verdict

Trading 212
5 categories won
Tied
1 categories
RoboForex
1 categories won

Trading 212 scores higher overall at 8.9/10 vs 8.4/10.

Score Comparison

OverallTrading 212 wins
Trading 2128.9
RoboForex8.4
Fees & CostsTrading 212 wins
Trading 2129.2
RoboForex8.7
PlatformsRoboForex wins
Trading 2128.6
RoboForex9.0
RegulationTrading 212 wins
Trading 2129.2
RoboForex7.5
ExecutionTrading 212 wins
Trading 2128.8
RoboForex8.6
SupportTie
Trading 2128.5
RoboForex8.5
EducationTrading 212 wins
Trading 2128.4
RoboForex8.2
InstrumentsTrading 212 wins
Trading 2129.0
RoboForex8.9

Trading Conditions

ConditionTrading 212RoboForex
Min Deposit€1$10
EUR/USD Spread0.9 pips average0.0 pips (Prime, ECN), 1.3 pips (Pro-Standard)
CommissionNone (spread-only on CFDs, zero commission on stocks/ETFs)$2.00 per lot per side (Prime), $20 per million (ECN), None (Pro-Standard)
Leverage (Retail)30:130:1 (EU entity)
Leverage (Pro)300:12000:1 (offshore)
Swap-FreeNoYes
Withdrawal FeeFreeFree on most methods

Platform Comparison

Trading 212 Platforms

  • Trading 212 Web
  • Trading 212 App
Account Types:

Invest, CFD, ISA (UK only)

RoboForex Platforms

  • MetaTrader 4
  • MetaTrader 5
  • cTrader
  • R StocksTrader
  • R WebTrader
  • R MobileTrader
Account Types:

Pro-Standard, Pro-Cent, Prime, ECN, R StocksTrader

Regulation & Safety

Trading 212 Regulation

FCAUKCySECCyprusFSCBulgaria
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

ICF up to EUR 20,000 (CySEC) / FSCS up to GBP 85,000 (UK)

RoboForex Regulation

FSCBelizeCySECCyprus
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

ICF up to EUR 20,000 (via RoboMarkets CySEC entity)

Overall Verdict

WinnerTrading 2128.9

Trading 212 takes the overall win with a score of 8.9 vs 8.4, winning 5 out of 7 individual categories compared to RoboForex's 1.

In terms of costs, Trading 212 also leads on fees. On the regulatory front, Trading 212 and offers stronger regulatory protection.

Choose Trading 212 if you prioritise its strengths in the categories where it leads. Choose RoboForex if you value the specific areas where it scores higher, such as platforms.

CFD Risk Warning

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

This website is for informational purposes only. The content does not constitute investment advice. Trading leveraged products carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. EU retail leverage limits apply (ESMA): up to 30:1 on major FX pairs, 20:1 on minor FX, 20:1 on major indices, 10:1 on commodities, 5:1 on equities, 2:1 on crypto.