FX-Brokers.eu
Menu
Trusted by traders25 brokers tested2,470+ pages indexedIndependent since 2024Updated daily

Pepperstone vs Trading 212

Head-to-head comparison of fees, platforms, regulation, and trading conditions to help you choose the right EU broker in 2026.

P
Pepperstone
Est. 2010 · Melbourne, Australia
9.3
VS
T2
Trading 212
Est. 2004 · London, UK
8.9

Quick Verdict

Pepperstone
5 categories won
Tied
0 categories
Trading 212
2 categories won

Pepperstone scores higher overall at 9.3/10 vs 8.9/10.

Score Comparison

OverallPepperstone wins
Pepperstone9.3
Trading 2128.9
Fees & CostsPepperstone wins
Pepperstone9.4
Trading 2129.2
PlatformsPepperstone wins
Pepperstone9.3
Trading 2128.6
RegulationPepperstone wins
Pepperstone9.5
Trading 2129.2
ExecutionPepperstone wins
Pepperstone9.5
Trading 2128.8
SupportPepperstone wins
Pepperstone9.0
Trading 2128.5
EducationTrading 212 wins
Pepperstone8.0
Trading 2128.4
InstrumentsTrading 212 wins
Pepperstone8.8
Trading 2129.0

Trading Conditions

ConditionPepperstoneTrading 212
Min DepositNone€1
EUR/USD Spread0.0 pips (Razor), 0.69 pips (Standard)0.9 pips average
Commission$3.50 per lot per side (Razor), None (Standard)None (spread-only on CFDs, zero commission on stocks/ETFs)
Leverage (Retail)30:130:1
Leverage (Pro)500:1300:1
Swap-FreeYesNo
Withdrawal FeeFreeFree

Platform Comparison

Pepperstone Platforms

  • MetaTrader 4
  • MetaTrader 5
  • cTrader
  • TradingView
Account Types:

Standard, Razor

Trading 212 Platforms

  • Trading 212 Web
  • Trading 212 App
Account Types:

Invest, CFD, ISA (UK only)

Regulation & Safety

Pepperstone Regulation

BaFinGermanyCySECCyprusFCAUKASICAustralia
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

ICF (Investor Compensation Fund) up to EUR 20,000

Trading 212 Regulation

FCAUKCySECCyprusFSCBulgaria
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

ICF up to EUR 20,000 (CySEC) / FSCS up to GBP 85,000 (UK)

Overall Verdict

WinnerPepperstone9.3

Pepperstone takes the overall win with a score of 9.3 vs 8.9, winning 5 out of 7 individual categories compared to Trading 212's 2.

In terms of costs, Pepperstone also leads on fees. On the regulatory front, Pepperstone and offers stronger regulatory protection.

Choose Pepperstone if you prioritise its strengths in the categories where it leads. Choose Trading 212 if you value the specific areas where it scores higher, such as education and instruments.

CFD Risk Warning

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

This website is for informational purposes only. The content does not constitute investment advice. Trading leveraged products carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. EU retail leverage limits apply (ESMA): up to 30:1 on major FX pairs, 20:1 on minor FX, 20:1 on major indices, 10:1 on commodities, 5:1 on equities, 2:1 on crypto.