FX-Brokers.eu
Menu
Trusted by traders25 brokers tested2,470+ pages indexedIndependent since 2024Updated daily

OANDA vs Pepperstone

Head-to-head comparison of fees, platforms, regulation, and trading conditions to help you choose the right EU broker in 2026.

O
OANDA
Est. 1996 · New York, USA
8.6
VS
P
Pepperstone
Est. 2010 · Melbourne, Australia
9.4

CFD risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs.

Quick Verdict

OANDA
1 categories won
Tied
0 categories
Pepperstone
6 categories won

Pepperstone scores higher overall at 9.4/10 vs 8.6/10.

Score Comparison

OverallPepperstone wins
OANDA8.6
Pepperstone9.4
Fees & CostsPepperstone wins
OANDA8.3
Pepperstone9.4
PlatformsPepperstone wins
OANDA8.5
Pepperstone9.3
RegulationPepperstone wins
OANDA9.2
Pepperstone9.5
ExecutionPepperstone wins
OANDA8.8
Pepperstone9.5
SupportPepperstone wins
OANDA8.0
Pepperstone9.0
EducationOANDA wins
OANDA8.5
Pepperstone8.0
InstrumentsPepperstone wins
OANDA7.8
Pepperstone8.8

Trading Conditions

ConditionOANDAPepperstone
Min DepositNoneNone
EUR/USD Spread0.6 pips average0.0 pips (Razor), 0.69 pips (Standard)
CommissionNone (Standard), varies (Core Pricing)$3.50 per lot per side (Razor), None (Standard)
Leverage (Retail)30:130:1
Leverage (Pro)200:1500:1
Swap-FreeNoYes
Withdrawal FeeFreeFree

Platform Comparison

OANDA Platforms

  • OANDA Platform
  • MetaTrader 4
  • MetaTrader 5
  • TradingView
Account Types:

Standard, Core Pricing, Premium

Pepperstone Platforms

  • MetaTrader 4
  • MetaTrader 5
  • cTrader
  • TradingView
Account Types:

Standard, Razor

Regulation & Safety

OANDA Regulation

FCAUKASICAustraliaNFAUSA
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

FSCS up to GBP 85,000 (UK entity)

Pepperstone Regulation

BaFinGermanyCySECCyprusFCAUKASICAustralia
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

ICF (Investor Compensation Fund) up to EUR 20,000

Overall Verdict

WinnerPepperstone9.4

Pepperstone takes the overall win with a score of 9.4 vs 8.6, winning 6 out of 7 individual categories compared to OANDA's 1.

In terms of costs, Pepperstone also leads on fees. On the regulatory front, Pepperstone and offers stronger regulatory protection.

Choose Pepperstone if you prioritise its strengths in the categories where it leads. Choose OANDA if you value the specific areas where it scores higher, such as education.

CFD Risk Warning

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

This website is for informational purposes only. The content does not constitute investment advice. Trading leveraged products carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. EU retail leverage limits apply (ESMA): up to 30:1 on major FX pairs, 20:1 on minor FX, 20:1 on major indices, 10:1 on commodities, 5:1 on equities, 2:1 on crypto.