FX-Brokers.eu
Menu
Trusted by traders25 brokers tested2,470+ pages indexedIndependent since 2024Updated daily

Interactive Brokers vs Trading 212

Head-to-head comparison of fees, platforms, regulation, and trading conditions to help you choose the right EU broker in 2026.

IB
Interactive Brokers
Est. 1978 · Greenwich, Connecticut, USA
9.1
VS
T2
Trading 212
Est. 2004 · London, UK
8.9

Quick Verdict

Interactive Brokers
4 categories won
Tied
0 categories
Trading 212
3 categories won

Interactive Brokers scores higher overall at 9.1/10 vs 8.9/10.

Score Comparison

OverallInteractive Brokers wins
Interactive Brokers9.1
Trading 2128.9
Fees & CostsTrading 212 wins
Interactive Brokers9.0
Trading 2129.2
PlatformsInteractive Brokers wins
Interactive Brokers9.0
Trading 2128.6
RegulationInteractive Brokers wins
Interactive Brokers9.9
Trading 2129.2
ExecutionInteractive Brokers wins
Interactive Brokers9.5
Trading 2128.8
SupportTrading 212 wins
Interactive Brokers7.5
Trading 2128.5
EducationTrading 212 wins
Interactive Brokers8.0
Trading 2128.4
InstrumentsInteractive Brokers wins
Interactive Brokers9.8
Trading 2129.0

Trading Conditions

ConditionInteractive BrokersTrading 212
Min DepositNone€1
EUR/USD Spread0.1 pips (average with commission)0.9 pips average
Commission$2.00 per lot (tiered, volume-based discounts)None (spread-only on CFDs, zero commission on stocks/ETFs)
Leverage (Retail)30:130:1
Leverage (Pro)200:1300:1
Swap-FreeNoNo
Withdrawal FeeFree (1 per month, then varies by method)Free

Platform Comparison

Interactive Brokers Platforms

  • Trader Workstation (TWS)
  • IBKR Mobile
  • IBKR GlobalTrader
  • Client Portal
Account Types:

Individual, Joint, IRA, Advisors, Institutional

Trading 212 Platforms

  • Trading 212 Web
  • Trading 212 App
Account Types:

Invest, CFD, ISA (UK only)

Regulation & Safety

Interactive Brokers Regulation

SECUSAFCAUKCBIIrelandMNBHungary
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

Irish Investor Compensation Scheme up to EUR 20,000

Trading 212 Regulation

FCAUKCySECCyprusFSCBulgaria
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

ICF up to EUR 20,000 (CySEC) / FSCS up to GBP 85,000 (UK)

Overall Verdict

WinnerInteractive Brokers9.1

Interactive Brokers takes the overall win with a score of 9.1 vs 8.9, winning 4 out of 7 individual categories compared to Trading 212's 3.

In terms of costs, though Trading 212 edges ahead on fees. On the regulatory front, Interactive Brokers and offers stronger regulatory protection.

Choose Interactive Brokers if you prioritise its strengths in the categories where it leads. Choose Trading 212 if you value the specific areas where it scores higher, such as fees & costs, support, and more.

CFD Risk Warning

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

This website is for informational purposes only. The content does not constitute investment advice. Trading leveraged products carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. EU retail leverage limits apply (ESMA): up to 30:1 on major FX pairs, 20:1 on minor FX, 20:1 on major indices, 10:1 on commodities, 5:1 on equities, 2:1 on crypto.