FX-Brokers.eu
Menu
Trusted by traders25 brokers tested2,470+ pages indexedIndependent since 2024Updated daily

IC Markets vs Pepperstone

Head-to-head comparison of fees, platforms, regulation, and trading conditions to help you choose the right EU broker in 2026.

IM
IC Markets
Est. 2007 · Sydney, Australia
9.1
VS
P
Pepperstone
Est. 2010 · Melbourne, Australia
9.4

CFD risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs.

Quick Verdict

IC Markets
1 categories won
Tied
1 categories
Pepperstone
5 categories won

Pepperstone scores higher overall at 9.4/10 vs 9.1/10.

Score Comparison

OverallPepperstone wins
IC Markets9.1
Pepperstone9.4
Fees & CostsPepperstone wins
IC Markets9.3
Pepperstone9.4
PlatformsIC Markets wins
IC Markets9.4
Pepperstone9.3
RegulationPepperstone wins
IC Markets8.8
Pepperstone9.5
ExecutionPepperstone wins
IC Markets9.4
Pepperstone9.5
SupportPepperstone wins
IC Markets8.8
Pepperstone9.0
EducationTie
IC Markets8.0
Pepperstone8.0
InstrumentsPepperstone wins
IC Markets8.6
Pepperstone8.8

Trading Conditions

ConditionIC MarketsPepperstone
Min Deposit$200None
EUR/USD Spread0.0 pips (Raw Spread), 0.6 pips (Standard)0.0 pips (Razor), 0.69 pips (Standard)
Commission$3.50 per lot per side (Raw Spread), None (Standard)$3.50 per lot per side (Razor), None (Standard)
Leverage (Retail)30:130:1
Leverage (Pro)500:1500:1
Swap-FreeYesYes
Withdrawal FeeFree (broker absorbs international wire fees up to certain volumes)Free

Platform Comparison

IC Markets Platforms

  • MetaTrader 4
  • MetaTrader 5
  • cTrader
  • TradingView
Account Types:

Standard, Raw Spread (MT4/MT5), Raw Spread (cTrader)

Pepperstone Platforms

  • MetaTrader 4
  • MetaTrader 5
  • cTrader
  • TradingView
Account Types:

Standard, Razor

Regulation & Safety

IC Markets Regulation

ASICAustraliaCySECCyprusFSASeychelles
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

ICF up to EUR 20,000 (via CySEC entity)

Pepperstone Regulation

BaFinGermanyCySECCyprusFCAUKASICAustralia
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

ICF (Investor Compensation Fund) up to EUR 20,000

Overall Verdict

WinnerPepperstone9.4

Pepperstone takes the overall win with a score of 9.4 vs 9.1, winning 5 out of 7 individual categories compared to IC Markets's 1.

In terms of costs, Pepperstone also leads on fees. On the regulatory front, Pepperstone and offers stronger regulatory protection.

Choose Pepperstone if you prioritise its strengths in the categories where it leads. Choose IC Markets if you value the specific areas where it scores higher, such as platforms.

CFD Risk Warning

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

This website is for informational purposes only. The content does not constitute investment advice. Trading leveraged products carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. EU retail leverage limits apply (ESMA): up to 30:1 on major FX pairs, 20:1 on minor FX, 20:1 on major indices, 10:1 on commodities, 5:1 on equities, 2:1 on crypto.