FX-Brokers.eu
Menu

Pepperstone vs Interactive Brokers

Head-to-head comparison of fees, platforms, regulation, and trading conditions to help you choose the right EU broker in 2026.

P
Pepperstone
Est. 2010 · Melbourne, Australia
9.3
VS
IB
Interactive Brokers
Est. 1978 · Greenwich, Connecticut, USA
9.1

Quick Verdict

Pepperstone
3 categories won
Tied
2 categories
Interactive Brokers
2 categories won

Pepperstone scores higher overall at 9.3/10 vs 9.1/10.

Score Comparison

OverallPepperstone wins
Pepperstone9.3
Interactive Brokers9.1
Fees & CostsPepperstone wins
Pepperstone9.4
Interactive Brokers9.0
PlatformsPepperstone wins
Pepperstone9.3
Interactive Brokers9.0
RegulationInteractive Brokers wins
Pepperstone9.5
Interactive Brokers9.9
ExecutionTie
Pepperstone9.5
Interactive Brokers9.5
SupportPepperstone wins
Pepperstone9.0
Interactive Brokers7.5
EducationTie
Pepperstone8.0
Interactive Brokers8.0
InstrumentsInteractive Brokers wins
Pepperstone8.8
Interactive Brokers9.8

Trading Conditions

ConditionPepperstoneInteractive Brokers
Min DepositNoneNone
EUR/USD Spread0.0 pips (Razor), 0.69 pips (Standard)0.1 pips (average with commission)
Commission$3.50 per lot per side (Razor), None (Standard)$2.00 per lot (tiered, volume-based discounts)
Leverage (Retail)30:130:1
Leverage (Pro)500:1200:1
Swap-FreeYesNo
Withdrawal FeeFreeFree (1 per month, then varies by method)

Platform Comparison

Pepperstone Platforms

  • MetaTrader 4
  • MetaTrader 5
  • cTrader
  • TradingView
Account Types:

Standard, Razor

Interactive Brokers Platforms

  • Trader Workstation (TWS)
  • IBKR Mobile
  • IBKR GlobalTrader
  • Client Portal
Account Types:

Individual, Joint, IRA, Advisors, Institutional

Regulation & Safety

Pepperstone Regulation

BaFinGermanyCySECCyprusFCAUKASICAustralia
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

ICF (Investor Compensation Fund) up to EUR 20,000

Interactive Brokers Regulation

SECUSAFCAUKCBIIrelandMNBHungary
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

Irish Investor Compensation Scheme up to EUR 20,000

Overall Verdict

WinnerPepperstone9.3

Pepperstone takes the overall win with a score of 9.3 vs 9.1, winning 3 out of 7 individual categories compared to Interactive Brokers's 2.

In terms of costs, Pepperstone also leads on fees. On the regulatory front, Pepperstone though Interactive Brokers has a regulatory edge.

Choose Pepperstone if you prioritise its strengths in the categories where it leads. Choose Interactive Brokers if you value the specific areas where it scores higher, such as regulation and instruments.

CFD Risk Warning

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

This website is for informational purposes only. The content does not constitute investment advice. Trading leveraged products carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. EU retail leverage limits apply (ESMA): up to 30:1 on major FX pairs, 20:1 on minor FX, 20:1 on major indices, 10:1 on commodities, 5:1 on equities, 2:1 on crypto.