FX-Brokers.eu
Menu

Interactive Brokers vs FXCM

Head-to-head comparison of fees, platforms, regulation, and trading conditions to help you choose the right EU broker in 2026.

IB
Interactive Brokers
Est. 1978 · Greenwich, Connecticut, USA
9.1
VS
F
FXCM
Est. 1999 · London, UK
8.1

Quick Verdict

Interactive Brokers
5 categories won
Tied
1 categories
FXCM
1 categories won

Interactive Brokers scores higher overall at 9.1/10 vs 8.1/10.

Score Comparison

OverallInteractive Brokers wins
Interactive Brokers9.1
FXCM8.1
Fees & CostsInteractive Brokers wins
Interactive Brokers9.0
FXCM8.0
PlatformsInteractive Brokers wins
Interactive Brokers9.0
FXCM8.2
RegulationInteractive Brokers wins
Interactive Brokers9.9
FXCM8.5
ExecutionInteractive Brokers wins
Interactive Brokers9.5
FXCM8.5
SupportFXCM wins
Interactive Brokers7.5
FXCM7.8
EducationTie
Interactive Brokers8.0
FXCM8.0
InstrumentsInteractive Brokers wins
Interactive Brokers9.8
FXCM7.8

Trading Conditions

ConditionInteractive BrokersFXCM
Min DepositNone£50
EUR/USD Spread0.1 pips (average with commission)0.2 pips (Active Trader), 1.3 pips (Standard)
Commission$2.00 per lot (tiered, volume-based discounts)None (spread-only on all accounts)
Leverage (Retail)30:130:1
Leverage (Pro)200:1400:1
Swap-FreeNoNo
Withdrawal FeeFree (1 per month, then varies by method)Free

Platform Comparison

Interactive Brokers Platforms

  • Trader Workstation (TWS)
  • IBKR Mobile
  • IBKR GlobalTrader
  • Client Portal
Account Types:

Individual, Joint, IRA, Advisors, Institutional

FXCM Platforms

  • Trading Station
  • MetaTrader 4
  • TradingView
  • ZuluTrade
Account Types:

Standard, Active Trader

Regulation & Safety

Interactive Brokers Regulation

SECUSAFCAUKCBIIrelandMNBHungary
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

Irish Investor Compensation Scheme up to EUR 20,000

FXCM Regulation

FCAUKASICAustralia
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

FSCS up to GBP 85,000 (UK entity)

Overall Verdict

WinnerInteractive Brokers9.1

Interactive Brokers takes the overall win with a score of 9.1 vs 8.1, winning 5 out of 7 individual categories compared to FXCM's 1.

In terms of costs, Interactive Brokers also leads on fees. On the regulatory front, Interactive Brokers and offers stronger regulatory protection.

Choose Interactive Brokers if you prioritise its strengths in the categories where it leads. Choose FXCM if you value the specific areas where it scores higher, such as support.

CFD Risk Warning

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

This website is for informational purposes only. The content does not constitute investment advice. Trading leveraged products carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. EU retail leverage limits apply (ESMA): up to 30:1 on major FX pairs, 20:1 on minor FX, 20:1 on major indices, 10:1 on commodities, 5:1 on equities, 2:1 on crypto.